voxen

Chapter 7: The Brother’s Version

Elaine called the next morning while I was sitting at my kitchen island, staring at the empty chair across from me.

I had not slept much. The house was quiet, but it no longer felt peaceful. Every ordinary thing—the framed photograph of my parents, the polished counters, the unopened mail—seemed to belong to a life I had mistaken for safe.

“Vanessa’s representative gave the investigators her brother’s name and contact information,” Elaine said. “They’ve asked him to provide an account.”

“Has he agreed?”

“He has. Voluntarily, through his attorney.”

I looked down at my coffee. “And Vanessa?”

“She still hasn’t told me anything directly. Her representative says she wants to cooperate, but that is not the same as a verified statement.”

The distinction was becoming familiar. A name was not proof. An offer was not proof. Even a recording could show only what fell within its frame.

“Do they want me there?”

“No. You should stay out of the interview. If the investigators need your help, they’ll ask.”

“I understand.”

I did understand. I also hated sitting still while strangers tried to assemble the truth from pieces of my life.

That afternoon, Elaine and I met Officer Patel at the station. Officer Lewis joined us a few minutes later, carrying a thin folder. Neither officer looked as if they were there to deliver a verdict.

Patel sat across from us.

“Vanessa’s brother spoke with us this morning,” she said. “He denies having anything to do with the access request.”

“Did he say who did?” I asked.

“He said he didn’t know.”

Lewis opened the folder but didn’t slide it toward me.

“He also gave us a timeline,” he said. “He told us he first contacted Elaine Park’s firm the morning after the late-night message. According to him, he was not involved in any communication with the firm that night.”

Elaine’s expression stayed professional. “Did he explain why he contacted us the next morning?”

“He said he was checking whether Vanessa had asked anyone to obtain documents from the firm. He described it as a family conversation that came up after the request had already been made.”

I held on to the wording. He didn’t know about the request until afterward, but he had contacted the firm to ask about it.

“Did Vanessa tell him about the message?” I asked.

“That’s something we’re checking,” Patel said. “We’re not treating his account as established fact. We’re comparing it with records and other statements.”

Lewis turned a page.

“He says he had no access to the authorization and did not prepare it. He also says he was not at your house that night.”

“Can you tell whether he was?”

“Not from what we have so far,” Patel replied. “We’re following up on the records he gave us.”

I felt the old impulse to fill the quiet with certainty. To call him a liar. To decide that Vanessa’s offer to identify the requester had been a way to point investigators toward someone else.

But none of those conclusions would help Teresa. None would make the evidence stronger.

Elaine leaned forward.

“Did he give you a specific time for his first contact with the firm?”

“He did,” Patel said. “He said it was at approximately eight the next morning.”

Elaine glanced at Lewis. “Our custodian may be able to verify whether there was earlier contact. The firm’s original records are preserved.”

“We’ve requested them,” Patel said. “We don’t want David making inquiries on his own. If the records come directly to us, we can document how they were obtained.”

I nodded. “I won’t contact anyone.”

Patel watched me for a moment, perhaps making sure I meant it.

“Good. We’ll follow the evidence where it goes. We’re not asking you to decide what his involvement was.”

“I’m trying not to.”

The words came out more tired than I intended.

After the officers left the room, Elaine gathered her notes.

“You did well,” she said.

“I just sat there.”

“That was the right thing to do. You heard an account. You didn’t turn it into a finding.”

I wondered how many times I would have to hear a version of the truth before I could trust it. Teresa had told me what she overheard. Vanessa had denied wrongdoing through her representative. Now her brother denied involvement and offered an explanation that might be sincere, mistaken, or carefully constructed.

None of it settled the question of who had tried to obtain my documents.

We were still in Elaine’s office when she received a call from the firm’s records custodian. She listened without speaking, then asked him to repeat the time.

“Please don’t change or forward anything,” she said. “Send the preserved log directly to Officer Patel’s secure address, exactly as it exists.”

She ended the call and looked toward me.

“What is it?” I asked.

“The custodian found an earlier contact in the firm’s preserved access log.”

Elaine turned her laptop so she could review the record without handing me the device. The entry showed a time, a call duration, and a callback number. Beside it was a note made by the custodian at the time: the caller asked whether an authorization could be processed quickly.

“What time?” Lewis asked from the doorway. He had returned to collect a document Elaine had promised the investigators.

Elaine read from the log.

“Ten thirty-seven p.m.”

I looked at the number. I recognized none of the digits, but Elaine compared it with the contact information the brother had provided during his interview.

Her face changed.

“Officer Lewis,” she said, “this number matches the one he gave you.”

Lewis stepped closer to the screen. He studied the entry, then checked the time against his notes.

“He told us his first contact with the firm was the next morning,” he said.

The timestamp was seven minutes before the preserved follow-up message seeking quick access.

For a moment, no one spoke. The record did not prove who had made the call, what the caller knew, or whether the number alone identified the person speaking. But it did contradict the timeline he had just given investigators.

Lewis took out his phone.

“I’m sending this to Patel now,” he said. “No conclusions until we verify the record and ask him about it.”

Elaine saved nothing to her own files and kept her hands away from the original. The log remained exactly where the firm had preserved it, waiting for investigators to determine what it meant.

I stared at the timestamp.

May you like

The brother had said his first contact with the firm was the next morning.

The access log said someone using his number had called at 10:37 the night before.

Related Stories

Other posts